Much has been discussed about the younger generation and their supposed lack of engagement in the Brexit debate.
With related degrees, often from farming backgrounds and with a passion for our country’s agricultural traditions, those at the beginning of their working lives, or seeking to gain entry into the field, could be considered more informed than most in their demographic.
So how do the succession plan for tomorrow view the hot topic of today?
Far from apathy, when asked if they would vote, the graduates interviewed answered an unequivocal and un-hesitant affirmative. Regarded as having a huge impact on their own futures, they were far from disinterested or lacking in opinion. This emotive and highly complex issue was felt to be the biggest of their lives, one in which they wanted to be heard. Social media has allowed those that wish to engage their peer group in the discussion, posting their thoughts on open forums, indeed inviting comment.
The debate itself though seems to have alienated our youngsters even further from the political arena with personal attacks viewed as nothing more than tactics to obscure the facts.
Those working with growers and suppliers of fresh produce were vocal on the industry’s ability to survive without a migrant work force, their option to have the same freedom of movement as the goods they trade in a European market place and expressed awareness of the detrimental consequence of an ‘out’ vote on consumer prices.
Many commented on the farming community being split with the potential of losing EU subsidies a negative, while leaving the EU was deemed a potential opportunity to engage trading platforms further afield without the constraint of fluctuating currency.
Those working in agricultural machinery with revenue streams largely reliant on trade with European partners agreed with their cohorts in fresh produce that a foreign work force was of huge benefit, and further questioned our ability to maintain relationships with a Europe who might not wish to do business so readily if we left.
Interestingly, many felt that David Cameron should have waited to conduct his renegotiation until after the vote, stating that our economy has far more to offer the relationship than we gain from it and that holding fire might have strengthened our hand.
This largely ignored sector of the voting public is informed, invigorated by the opportunities available to them in our fast-paced, thriving produce industry and sees the debate for what it is. Are they pragmatists? It would seem so. As one interviewee commented ‘either way, we will survive’.
