I’m all for eliminating duplication wherever possible. Everyone in the supply chain, everywhere in the world would no doubt nod their heads if asked whether they agree with that. It is also good to see organisations in various countries co-operating with each other in the search for harmonisation, as is now the case with the new IFPS (page one).

But, the first thing that comes to mind when these new collaborative projects spring up is how they will affect the positive projects that are already in existence.

I’ve aired criticism of EurepGAP in the past, and there are still certain misgivings within the trade. But it has undeniably proved that as a scheme it has long-term value - why else would the industry have invested many millions of pounds in restructuring its house to adhere with EurepGAP protocols?

The IFPS has a wider brief than good agricultural practices. It too will add value to the industry in many ways, I’m sure. However, new organisations need to make a mark and too often, the first thought is to change things. The membership includes several high-powered nations, it is vital that this does not become another “them and us” exercise which alienates those who choose to stay outside of its confines.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. But if it is broken, mend it in a way that suits the masses, not the chosen few.